Directory of Standards Labs     Volunteer Roster     Committees     Job Search     Forums     Join NCSLI    
Home
Presidents' Message
Online Dues Payment
Membership
Welcome
Conference
Theme
Keynote Speaker
On-Line Registration
Registration Info
Technical Program
Tutorials
Exhibitor Listing
Schedule Overview
Committee Meetings
Current Sponsors
Sponsorship Programs
Hotel Discounts
Guest Program
International Event
VISA Processing Procedure
Volunteers Needed
Exhibit Sales 2008
Abstract Submit
Manuscript/Paper Instructions
2007 Presentations
Management
Future Conferences
Past Conferences
Accreditation
Calendar - Events
Calendar - Training
MyNCSLI
Measure Magazine
Metrologist Magazine
Region Events
Learning & Development
Metrology News
Resources
Publications
Streaming Video
Awards
Cubit Info
Forums
DRM FAQs
NCSLI Training Center
Metrology Jobs & Internships
Resume (Jobs & Internships)
Online Store
     

Abstract and Manuscript Management System - Abstract Detail

Main Menu | Abstracts
 
Speaker: Buddy Stricker
Title: A Mathematical Approach for Evaluating Metrologist Productivity
Topic Group: Workplace Development
E-mail: lester.h.stricker@boeing.com
Co-Authors:
Abstract: Among the most compelling business topics in the metrology community are the intertwined concepts of employee productivity and performance. For those firms that provide commercial calibration services, the level of productivity is often the key factor in determining whether the business is a success or a failure, because the employer’s profits rise and fall relative to peaks and valleys in employee productivity. In the contemporary business world, these factors are germane even when the metrology laboratory performs services for either government entities or larger parent organizations.

Classical business theory clearly demonstrates that the evaluation of individual employee productivity is critical to understanding the profitability of any service organization. Despite this inherent value, the majority of metrology organizations persist in using purely arbitrary tools to evaluate employee performance, instead of attempting to quantify individual productivity in a statistical manner. When observers dissect these tools, they discover how meaningless these evaluations really are. This situation is regrettable because while performance consists of many difficult to measure variables, metrology managers can typically quantify the critical parameter of productivity. This is especially true for companies that provide commercial services because they often base their fees on historical data, which reflects how long a specific task should take. Laboratories providing service to parent organizations see this problem magnified because upper management rarely attempts to quantify productivity of their internal departments. Far too often, they attempt to understand productivity dynamics only when the reality of being out-sourced confronts them. Regardless of the nature of their business, it is imperative that all metrology laboratories develop a mathematical approach for quantifying the productivity of their employees.

In this paper, the author combines his personal experiences in the calibration industry with statistical processes to demonstrate a method that results in meaningful metrics. This approach empowers managers by providing them with the tools required to make constructive systemic changes, to compensate employees in a more appropriate manner, and to understand their businesses at the grass roots level. By better understanding these variables, metrology organizations of every size and background can experience enhanced productivity and profitability.